Hi,
at the moment I try to figure out how the three configuration management approaches fit together. After switching to Monticello I found my life a lot easier :) Monticello is of great help!
Then I noticed that changesets are named after the Monticello package that was last imported. I'm not quite sure if changesets have any benefit if someone is using monticello.
Then there is squeakmap. Squeakmap seems to be the official release server. Is squeakmap tied to a special format? Can squeakmap use monticello packages as well? I'm asking because I had problems to find any version information on squeakmap (beside the squeakmap version).
While reading the squeak lists it appeared to me that a lot of you are developing with monticello and releasing on squeakmap. But I didn't find any information about the source (e.g. monticello version) version.
I think it would be great to install a release from squeakmap and having the opportunity to open monticello and see which newer versions (and most important what changes) have been made. The squeakmap packages could also add their repository to monticello when they are installed.
The only reason against it I can imagine is that this would introduce dependencies which aren't wanted.
Norbert