Proably because you're using #> and not #>=. If not that post the list of dates/times that don't sort properly.
also - #sort: & #sort sort in place. #sorted & sorted: make a new copy as you've seen. If your objects should always sort the same way just implement #<= in the instance side of your object and then you can use #sort or #sorted without having to add a sort block.
Raymond Asselin-4 wrote
For now I implemented:
sortedNotes ^notes sort:[:a :b | (a date = b date) and:[a temps > b temps]] .
AND
notesSorted ^notes sort:[:a :b | a date = b date ifTrue:[a temps > b temps] ifFalse:[a date > b date]] .
does exactly the same result.
But there is still notes in a same date that do not sort correctly, the begining is good and after 5 or so objects I get some witch do not seem to be sorted.
BTW don't know the difference between sort: and sorted: it seems as if the last one produce a new collection and the first one produce same collection but sorted.
Note: I use 24 hours instead of a.m. / p.m. is this may cause problems?
Le 2015-02-04 à 12:00, Paul DeBruicker <
pdebruic@
> a écrit :
a date = b date ifTrue:[a temps > b temps] ifFalse:[a date > b date]
Beginners mailing list
Beginners@.squeakfoundation
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/How-to-doubble-sort-a-collection-tp4803657p4803711.htm... Sent from the Squeak - Beginners mailing list archive at Nabble.com.