Waaah, belief and plausibility as sum over numbers; shudder; political-systems-failure through machine calculations; market-meltdown through machine calculations; poverty-for-everyone through machine calculations :( Anyways, have you compared to Pei Wang's NARS (or perhaps his "The limitation of Bayesianism"), that would be interesting [OT]. Tried to convince him that fractions are sufficient for him but he liked floats more (his early J* prototype had no system support for fractions ...).
wooww interesting but late for me :(
Do you have calculations of your model's epsilon on which you base your "imprecise", "uncertain", etc ? Or do you at present (for the prototype) just stab in the dark.
I guess I just stab in the dark... I have to leave, I'll read a bit and tell you later...
Thanks a lot ;)
Cédrick