El 5/11/08 3:18 AM, "Lee Nixon" psycloneranger@gmail.com escribió:
Took a look at that guy's music program and it looks like he's got the digital audio thing down in spades. That's one thing I haven't gotten into much myself. I'm more inclined to use physical instruments rather than manipulate bits and bytes, but what the heck--creativity is creativity and artistry is artistry no matter what kind of tools you're using. DaVinci could have figured it out using color crayons. So right now I'm trying Lime (notation editor) and it's looking pretty good--just need to wrangle up $65 somewhere so I can get past the free trial run. But I'm still thinking about cooking up something else on my own, and when I do I'll be sure to give Squeak another try. Does anyone here see a need for a little more standardization in the computer world? A friend of mine thinks that standardization would stifle ingenuity and creativity and so on. I'm more inclined to think those things are more than capable of taking care of themselves. Like look how two young guys with no formal musical training blew the crap out of the concrete standardized modules that the recording industry was promoting forty-five years ago. John Lennon and Paul McCartney, in case you're wondering who I'm talking about. But anyway--it's late--had too much coffee--starting to blabble, If anyone here feels like reading more of my blabble they can find me at psycloneranger@gmail.com.
I late on this thread but I say you must see this http://www.zogotounga.net/comp/squeak/sqgeo.htm
Next version of FunSqueak could be official Full Squeak , so I work with Stephane Rollandin if he agree on have it into.
But I also like help and if you wish have some Lime thing into the basic image or the full one , shoot your questions.
I could be found at random times in IRC Squeak channel, FunSqueak have it ready to run.
Also I know our work have bugs, and we start to quick fix all in 3.10.1, so stay tuned.
Edgar