You have a logic issue with the first one: sortedNotes ^notes sort:[:a :b | (a date = b date) and:[a temps > b temps]] . This is saying that the the two dates are different, then false. For this you probably want to be something like: sortedNotes ^notes sort:[:a :b | a date > b date or: [(a date = b date) and:[a temps > b temps]]] .
-cbc
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Raymond Asselin jgr.asselin@me.com wrote:
For now I implemented:
sortedNotes ^notes sort:[:a :b | (a date = b date) and:[a temps > b temps]] .
AND
notesSorted ^notes sort:[:a :b | a date = b date ifTrue:[a temps > b temps] ifFalse:[a date > b date]] .
does exactly the same result.
But there is still notes in a same date that do not sort correctly, the begining is good and after 5 or so objects I get some witch do not seem to be sorted.
BTW don't know the difference between sort: and sorted: it seems as if the last one produce a new collection and the first one produce same collection but sorted.
Note: I use 24 hours instead of a.m. / p.m. is this may cause problems?
Le 2015-02-04 à 12:00, Paul DeBruicker pdebruic@gmail.com a écrit :
a date = b date ifTrue:[a temps > b temps] ifFalse:[a date > b date]
Beginners mailing list Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners