On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:12 AM, cdrick cdrick65@gmail.com wrote:
2008/2/25, Michael van der Gulik mikevdg@gmail.com:
On 2/26/08, cdrick cdrick65@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I'm never going to advocate integrating my Namespaces implementation
into
the squeak.org image. It would be a bad idea -- squeak.org needs to
remain
compatible with the large base of code out there, and my Namespaces solution breaks backwards compatibility. Instead, I'm making a fork of Squeak called SecureSqueak which will use Namespaces extensively.
Interesting, I'll look at it for sure :) is it squeak-E ? where can we see it ?
No, it's not Squeak-E. That's a separate project.
Remember that its still work in progress. When its ready for general use, I'll announce it, but until then don't use it for anything other than exploring or playing around with!
http://gulik.pbwiki.com/SecureSqueak http://www.squeaksource.com/SecureSqueak
Gulik.