Hi,
I don't have an XO but use the Squeakland-OLPC etoys image on a Linux box. The update URL in this etoys image points to tinlizzie.org/updates/squeakland. Etoys bug fixes are going into tinlizzie.org/updates/etoys but not into updates/squeakland.
Will the Etoys image for XO and non-XO hardware start diverging? Or is the plan to keep them the same?
Subbu
Hi, Subbu,
At Mon, 9 Jun 2008 12:54:29 +0530, K. K. Subramaniam wrote:
Hi,
I don't have an XO but use the Squeakland-OLPC etoys image on a Linux box. The update URL in this etoys image points to tinlizzie.org/updates/squeakland. Etoys bug fixes are going into tinlizzie.org/updates/etoys but not into updates/squeakland.
Will the Etoys image for XO and non-XO hardware start diverging? Or is the plan to keep them the same?
In a sense, the answer is yes. Here is the reason:
A typical installation of Squeakland-OLPC will be at schools, and typically they have strict policy on changing/updating files (i.e., they don't like to change the applications once they are installed). We decided to release a frozen version for that year and not pushing updates to Squeakland-OLPC.
In the meantime, the actual OLPC development will be under day-to-day updates and modifications. We need to keep up with their release cycles, and we should answer the needs from deployments. We will be pushing updates to OLPC-Etoys.
After a year, or some time period, we will make a new Squeakland-OLPC package based on the latest changes on OLPC-Etoys. There, we do synchronize the base image not before too long.
There is a possibility that some changes to OLPC-Etoys may break the compatibility. (I.e., a project that made in the cutting edge OLPC-Etoys image might not load into the "latest" Squeakland-OLPC.) We should minimize this, but it would happen when that change is really needed.
-- Yoshiki
squeakland@lists.squeakfoundation.org