there was a great kedama tutorial by linda kao on the old squeakland site but I can't find it anywhere now
does anyone have an url or copy for it / of it?
Hi, here is a link to the old one: http://web.archive.org/web/20080617192213/http://www.squeakland.org/fun_proj...
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Bill Kerr billkerr@gmail.com wrote:
there was a great kedama tutorial by linda kao on the old squeakland site but I can't find it anywhere now
does anyone have an url or copy for it / of it?
squeakland mailing list squeakland@squeakland.org http://lists.squeakland.org/mailman/listinfo/squeakland
Hi, Yoshiki,
Do you think any reason to drop this great tutorial from "the new squeakland" site (while I know Kedama has some incompatibility) ?
If required changes is just to replace screenshot, I think we could make it public as-is and people could contribute.
/Korakurider
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:28 AM, karl ramberg karlramberg@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, here is a link to the old one: http://web.archive.org/web/20080617192213/http://www.squeakland.org/fun_proj...
Karl
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Bill Kerr billkerr@gmail.com wrote:
there was a great kedama tutorial by linda kao on the old squeakland site but I can't find it anywhere now does anyone have an url or copy for it / of it? _______________________________________________ squeakland mailing list squeakland@squeakland.org http://lists.squeakland.org/mailman/listinfo/squeakland
squeakland mailing list squeakland@squeakland.org http://lists.squeakland.org/mailman/listinfo/squeakland
At Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:00:00 +0900, Korakurider wrote:
Hi, Yoshiki,
Do you think any reason to drop this great tutorial from "the new squeakland" site (while I know Kedama has some incompatibility) ?
The compatibility seems relatively small, but there is one thing I consider to be critical difference. If you follow the instruction and create "infect" script and call it from 'setup", it doesn't work as described. The content of the infect needs to be inlined in the setup (and in "oneStep").
If required changes is just to replace screenshot, I think we could make it public as-is and people could contribute.
So, some changes should be desirable, unfortunately. But still, it would be nice to have tutorials available...
-- Yoshiki
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Yoshiki Ohshima yoshiki@vpri.org wrote:
So, some changes should be desirable, unfortunately. But still, it would be nice to have tutorials available...
Unless you will write something, why do you want to people to write tutorial from scratch?
I think the better way for sqF/vpri to facilitate contribution would be: + To collect some of historical contents and make them public on wiki, with caution of version incompatibility and invitation to people to retrofit. + to arrange license so that people could freely distribute/modify/translate materials. (IIRC original material didn't show CC-like condition)
/Korakurider
At Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:48:03 +0900, Korakurider wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Yoshiki Ohshima yoshiki@vpri.org wrote:
So, some changes should be desirable, unfortunately. But still, it would be nice to have tutorials available...
Unless you will write something, why do you want to people towrite tutorial from scratch?
Hmm? I didn't say I want people to write tutorials from scratch. I'd say it would be nice if somebody takes it and revise it. Exactly as you suggested.
I think the better way for sqF/vpri to facilitate contribution would be: + To collect some of historical contents and make them public onwiki, with caution of version incompatibility and invitation to people to retrofit. + to arrange license so that people could freely distribute/modify/translate materials. (IIRC original material didn't show CC-like condition)
Sounds good to me.
-- Yoshiki
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Yoshiki Ohshima yoshiki@vpri.org wrote:
At Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:48:03 +0900, Korakurider wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Yoshiki Ohshima yoshiki@vpri.org wrote:
So, some changes should be desirable, unfortunately. But still, it would be nice to have tutorials available...
Unless you will write something, why do you want to people to write tutorial from scratch?
Hmm? I didn't say I want people to write tutorials from scratch. I'd say it would be nice if somebody takes it and revise it. Exactly as you suggested.
My comment was about your organizations hiding historical contents.
I think the better way for sqF/vpri to facilitate contribution would be: + To collect some of historical contents and make them public on wiki, with caution of version incompatibility and invitation to people to retrofit. + to arrange license so that people could freely distribute/modify/translate materials. (IIRC original material didn't show CC-like condition)
Sounds good to me.
-- Yoshiki _______________________________________________ squeakland mailing list squeakland@squeakland.org http://lists.squeakland.org/mailman/listinfo/squeakland
At Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:23:53 +0900, Korakurider wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Yoshiki Ohshima yoshiki@vpri.org wrote:
At Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:48:03 +0900, Korakurider wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Yoshiki Ohshima yoshiki@vpri.org wrote:
So, some changes should be desirable, unfortunately. But still, it would be nice to have tutorials available...
Unless you will write something, why do you want to people to write tutorial from scratch?
Hmm? I didn't say I want people to write tutorials from scratch. I'd say it would be nice if somebody takes it and revise it. Exactly as you suggested.
My comment was about your organizations hiding historical contents.
Ah, "hiding" is not accurate. Right after Bill's inquery, we did ask the old site's master to dig the original up. But I would think that what I see on the archive.org is all it was.
-- Yoshiki
The "source" of the PDF version, the Word document file was found. So, I uploaded the file to:
http://wiki.squeakland.org/pages/viewpageattachments.action?pageId=16844
-- Yoshiki
On 2009-11-25 18:08, Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:
The "source" of the PDF version, the Word document file was found. So, I uploaded the file to:
http://wiki.squeakland.org/pages/viewpageattachments.action?pageId=16844
-- Yoshiki _______________________________________________ squeakland mailing list squeakland@squeakland.org http://lists.squeakland.org/mailman/listinfo/squeakland
Great, can we use this on http://en.flossmanuals.net/ ? http://en.flossmanuals.net/
Karl
At Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:25:56 +0100, Karl Ramberg wrote:
On 2009-11-25 18:08, Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:
The "source" of the PDF version, the Word document file was found. So, I uploaded the file to: http://wiki.squeakland.org/pages/viewpageattachments.action?pageId=16844 -- Yoshiki _______________________________________________ squeakland mailing list squeakland@squeakland.org http://lists.squeakland.org/mailman/listinfo/squeaklandGreat, can we use this on http://en.flossmanuals.net/ ?
Kim (the executive director of VPRI, who funded making the document) says it is perfectly fine to make it public so it should be fine to use it for the FLOSS manual.
-- Yoshiki
squeakland@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Bill Kerr -
karl ramberg -
Karl Ramberg
-
Korakurider -
Yoshiki Ohshima